1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,784 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Thunderbird (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2002 Honda Acty. (127 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Acty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 630 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Honda Acty | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Thunderbird | Acty |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4784 cc | 660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2460 mm |