1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2005 Isuzu KB is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2005 Isuzu KB. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2005 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu KB weights approximately 300 kg more than 1956 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Isuzu KB has automatic transmission and 1956 Ford Thunderbird has manual transmission. 1956 Ford Thunderbird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Isuzu KB will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Thunderbird | KB |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5112 cc | 2998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1810 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3030 mm |
