1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,784 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 300 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Dingo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4784 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2450 mm |