1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C70 weights approximately 151 kg more than 1956 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1956 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Thunderbird | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | C70 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1661 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2670 mm |