1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (124 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 235 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1956 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Ford Thunderbird 2009 Kia Cee'd
Make Ford Kia
Model Thunderbird Cee'd
Year Released 1956 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5112 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 223 HP 124 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1510 kg 1275 kg
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 4260 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2660 mm