1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1956 Ford Thunderbird. (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Thunderbird | Evora |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2576 mm |