1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1956 Ford Thunderbird. (223 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Thunderbird | UTE |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5112 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
