1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1956 Ford Thunderbird. (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 84 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Thunderbird | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Thunderbird | Evora |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 209 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2575 mm |
