1956 Ford Zodiac vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 638 kg more than 1956 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Zodiac | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Zodiac | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2730 mm |
