1956 Ford Zodiac vs. 1997 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 1997 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 447 kg more than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Zodiac | 1997 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Zodiac | Wagon |
Year Released | 1956 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2330 mm |