1956 Ford Zodiac vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 383 kg more than 1956 Ford Zodiac.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Zodiac | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Zodiac | Zo |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2580 mm |
