1956 Ford Zodiac vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 278 kg more than 1956 Ford Zodiac.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Ford Zodiac (187 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1956 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Zodiac | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Zodiac | F1 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2210 mm |
