1956 Ford Zodiac vs. 2005 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Almera (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1956 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 62 kg more than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Because 1956 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Ford Zodiac (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Almera. (162 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1956 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Zodiac | 2005 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Zodiac | Almera |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1769 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 1130 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2540 mm |