1956 Ford Zodiac vs. 2007 Volkswagen Transporter
To start off, 2007 Volkswagen Transporter is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volkswagen Transporter (104 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1956 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volkswagen Transporter should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1956 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Volkswagen Transporter, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volkswagen Transporter (250 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Volkswagen Transporter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Zodiac | 2007 Volkswagen Transporter | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Zodiac | Transporter |
Year Released | 1956 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 136 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3010 mm |