1956 Ford Zodiac vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 22 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Zodiac | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Zodiac | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2550 mm |