1956 GAZ M-20 vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1968 Zastava 1300 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1956 GAZ M-20. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1956 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 GAZ M-20 (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1956 GAZ M-20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1956 GAZ M-20 | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | GAZ | Zastava |
Model | M-20 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2430 mm |