1956 GAZ M-20 vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 1982 Audi 4000 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 4000 (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1956 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 should accelerate faster than 1956 GAZ M-20.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 4000 (137 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm). This means 1982 Audi 4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 GAZ M-20. 1982 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 1956 GAZ M-20 has manual transmission. 1956 GAZ M-20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 GAZ M-20 | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | GAZ | Audi |
| Model | M-20 | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2550 mm |
