1956 GAZ M-20 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1956 GAZ M-20. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1956 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 646 kg more than 1956 GAZ M-20. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1956 GAZ M-20 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | GAZ | Volvo |
Model | M-20 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2870 mm |