1956 GAZ M-20 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1956 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1956 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1956 GAZ M-20 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | GAZ | Toyota |
Model | M-20 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1784 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |