1956 GAZ M-20 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1956 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 GAZ M-20 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | GAZ | Renault |
| Model | M-20 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1390 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
