1956 GAZ M-20 vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1956 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1956 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3.

Because 1956 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 GAZ M-20.

Compare all specifications:

1956 GAZ M-20 2013 Mazda 3
Make GAZ Mazda
Model M-20 3
Year Released 1956 2013
Engine Size 2120 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 146 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Vehicle Weight 1460 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4595 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1650 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2640 mm