1956 Holden FE vs. 1965 NSU Autonova
To start off, 1965 NSU Autonova is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Holden FE (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1965 NSU Autonova. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Holden FE should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Autonova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Holden FE weights approximately 245 kg more than 1965 NSU Autonova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Holden FE | 1965 NSU Autonova | |
Make | Holden | NSU |
Model | FE | Autonova |
Year Released | 1956 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2260 mm |