1956 Holden FE vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Holden FE would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1956 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1956 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 160 kg more than 1956 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Holden FE | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Holden | Sunbeam |
Model | FE | Tiger |
Year Released | 1956 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2190 mm |