1956 Holden FE vs. 1979 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1979 Toyota Tercel is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Holden FE weights approximately 160 kg more than 1979 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1956 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Holden FE | 1979 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | FE | Tercel |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |
