1956 Holden FE vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1956 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 1956 Holden FE.
Because 1956 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Holden FE. (151 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Holden FE | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Holden | Peugeot |
Model | FE | 5008 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2735 mm |