1956 Holden FJ vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Holden FJ would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Holden FJ | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Holden | Cadillac |
| Model | FJ | CTS |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2150 cc | 3175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2890 mm |
