1956 Holden FJ vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Holden FJ would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Holden FJ | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FJ | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2150 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2880 mm |