1956 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 1961 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1961 Lotus Seven is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Hudson Metropolitan (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1961 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Hudson Metropolitan should accelerate faster than 1961 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Hudson Metropolitan weights approximately 378 kg more than 1961 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Hudson Metropolitan | 1961 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Hudson | Lotus |
| Model | Metropolitan | Seven |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 432 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2240 mm |
