1956 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Hudson Metropolitan | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Hudson | Ford |
| Model | Metropolitan | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1760 mm |
