1956 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 2005 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Hudson Metropolitan weights approximately 20 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1956 Hudson Metropolitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Hudson Metropolitan | 2005 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Hudson | Mitsubishi |
Model | Metropolitan | eK |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2350 mm |