1956 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 2011 Volvo C70
To start off, 2011 Volvo C70 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C70 weights approximately 930 kg more than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan.
Because 1956 Hudson Metropolitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. (76 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Hudson Metropolitan | 2011 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Hudson | Volvo |
Model | Metropolitan | C70 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 76 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2639 mm |