1956 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. (76 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Hudson Metropolitan | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Hudson | Holden |
Model | Metropolitan | UTE |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 76 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |