1956 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1956 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1956 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 520 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 1956 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 1956 Humber Super Snipe has manual transmission. 1956 Humber Super Snipe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Humber Super Snipe | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Humber | Lancia |
Model | Super Snipe | Nea |
Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2590 mm |