1956 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1956 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1956 Humber Super Snipe.
Because 1956 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Humber Super Snipe | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Humber | Holden |
| Model | Super Snipe | Epica |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |
