1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 1966 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1966 Skoda 1202 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Isuzu Minx (45 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1966 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1966 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Isuzu Minx (91 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1956 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Isuzu Minx | 1966 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Isuzu | Skoda |
Model | Minx | 1202 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 91 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2690 mm |