1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 1968 Volvo 145 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Volvo 145 (81 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Volvo 145 should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 344 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Isuzu Minx | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | Minx | 145 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2620 mm |
