1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (45 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (91 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Isuzu Minx | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 91 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2480 mm |