1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,410 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste (74 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 40 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (91 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Isuzu Minx | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | Minx | Celeste |
Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 91 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2350 mm |