1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (283 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1474 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Isuzu Minx | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Isuzu | Land Rover |
Model | Minx | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 283 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2890 mm |