1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1956 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Isuzu Minx | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | 3 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |