1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 584 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Isuzu Minx | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | 3 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2650 mm |