1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 2009 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2009 Renault Symbol is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Symbol (74 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Symbol weights approximately 34 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Isuzu Minx | 2009 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Isuzu | Renault |
| Model | Minx | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2473 mm |
