1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 101 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Isuzu Minx | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
Model | Minx | Polo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2470 mm |