1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 130 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (91 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Isuzu Minx. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1956 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1956 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Isuzu Minx | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Isuzu | Smart |
| Model | Minx | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 1867 mm |
