1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1963 Simca 1300
To start off, 1963 Simca 1300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1300. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1963 Simca 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Simca 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1300. (102 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Jeep CJ5 | 1963 Simca 1300 | |
Make | Jeep | Simca |
Model | CJ5 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2530 mm |