1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1986 Opel Omega
To start off, 1986 Opel Omega is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1986 Opel Omega. (122 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Opel Omega weights approximately 130 kg more than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Omega. (175 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Jeep CJ5 | 1986 Opel Omega | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | CJ5 | Omega |
Year Released | 1956 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2740 mm |