1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1956 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Jeep CJ5 | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ5 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3153 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2350 mm |
