1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda SW-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 1956 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Jeep CJ5 | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ5 | SW-X |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1105 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |
