1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1956 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 118 kg more than 2001 Renault Clio.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Renault Clio (207 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 2001 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Jeep CJ5 | 2001 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ5 | Clio |
Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3153 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1350 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2590 mm |