1956 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2002 Mahindra Commander
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Commander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Commander. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Commander weights approximately 190 kg more than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Commander. (123 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Commander.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Jeep CJ5 | 2002 Mahindra Commander | |
Make | Jeep | Mahindra |
Model | CJ5 | Commander |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2112 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2690 mm |